A Landmark Shift in CSR Taxation: ITAT Delhi Opens Door for 80G Deductions on CSR Contributions

image

Recently, in a precedent-setting move, the ITAT (Income Tax Appellate tribunal) Delhi issued a ruling that allows Indian companies to view their CSR spending from the taxation standpoint. The verdict that stems from the case Schenker India Private limited vs ACIT (Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax) clarifies how you can claim tax deductions for your CSR contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act 1961. Considering this verdict, companies can now reshape their corporate strategies and perceptions around CSR contributions and obligations.

Before we go ahead, you must first know what ITAT is? It’s a quasi-judicial authority in India where an assessee can challenge the orders passed by the income tax department including those from Assessing officers, Dispute Resolution Panels and Commissioners of Income Tax. Its decisions can act as persuasive precedents and can be challenged only in the High Court.

Background of the case:

Schenker India Pvt. Ltd., a leading logistics company, files its income tax return for AY 2018-19. The company declared INR 94,68,29, 620 as its taxable income. However, during assessment proceedings, the ACIT proposed to disallow a tax deduction of INR 34, 69, 235 claimed by the company under section 80G. This claim was related to the donations that company made as a part of their CSR expenditure, which was a total of INR 74,10,470 during the relevant year. This amount included donations (worth INR 69,38,470) to institutions that are eligible under section 80G.

Issues raised by Appellate Authority:

The main issue was that the CSR payments done by Schenker India Pvt. Ltd. cannot be claimed under section 80G, which allows for tax deductions for amount spent through charity and donations. thehe Assessing officer argued that CSR expenditure is mandatory as under section 135 of companies act, 2013 and thus, cannot be considered as voluntary donations (to be claimed under section 80G).

Assessee’s arguments:

Schenker India Pvt. Ltd. Puts forth its arguments based on two facts-

·       Firstly, the section 135 of the Companies Act does not prohibit anybody to claim the CSR expenditure for deductions under section 80G. Section 80G is entirely independent of section 37 of Income tax Act which handles business-related expenses and deductions. Understanding the fact that the CSR expenses cannot be claimed under section 37, the company disallowed it from there. The company claimed that though CSR expenditure is mandatory, it cannot be disqualified from being considered as a donation as mentioned in section 80G.

·       Secondly, the company also claimed that the CSR expenditure was done as a philanthropic act and the company is not getting any benefit out of it. This is the key feature to consider any expense as donation. Considering the voluntary aspect of the payment, the deductions under section 80G should be allowed.

Support from previous legal precedents:

To support its arguments, the company also referred to previous decisions of ITAT in different cases. Firstly, the company highlighted the case of Interglobe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITA No. 95/Del/2024), where ITAT observed that though CSR expenditure are mandatory, it cannot negate its philanthropic or voluntary character.

Another case of case of Cheil India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (2024) was also taken into consideration where similar issue was raised and tribunal took the decision in favour of assessee allowing deductions for CSR payments under section 80G.

The Decision:

Schenker India Pvt. Ltd. requested the Tribunal to consider the legislative intent behind section 80G, which does not forbid any CSR donations to be eligible for deductions, provided they are made to eligible institutions.

After hearing both the sides, the tribunal issued a ruling that CSR spending is application of income and such applications can qualify under section 80G, provided some conditions are met. If the law intends to disallow all CSR donations from section 80G, it should have mentioned there. But it is not. Just because the CSR is mandated by the law, the donations made under CSR cannot be disallowed for deductions under section 80G.

The conclusion:

The outcome of this case has set an important precedent for the other cases and companies facing similar issues. such decisions paved the way for the clearer guidelines on how CSR donations can be used for tax purposes so that there will be consistency in the tax assessments. Further, such ruling also encourages the corporate houses to adopt more effective measures to include social responsibility in their CSR contributions.